Comments for FastbackStack, LLC - Classic Mustang Blog

Comment on 1964 1/2 1965 1966 HiPo 289 K Code Engine by admin

admin — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 16:25:05 +0000

We have a cast iron intake. What casting number and date code are you looking for?

Comment on 1964 1/2 1965 1966 HiPo 289 K Code Engine by keith browning

keith browning — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 16:12:18 +0000

looking for cast iron intake and carb for 66 hipo.

Comment on Ford Mustang Top Loader 4 speed Manual Transmission by admin

admin — Fri, 16 Oct 2009 16:48:04 +0000

Hi Mark, We do have a Top Loader 4 speed, as well as other parts. Contact us for details.

Comment on Ford Mustang Top Loader 4 speed Manual Transmission by mark young

mark young — Fri, 16 Oct 2009 02:18:22 +0000

looking for top loader 4 spd. for mustang maybe cougar any help appreciated, thanks mark

Comment on The evolution of the Mustang 428 CJ by The Powerful Ford Boss 302 Mustang | Auto Blog

The Powerful Ford Boss 302 Mustang | Auto Blog — Fri, 02 Oct 2009 10:54:01 +0000

[...] The evolution of the Mustang 428 CJ [...]

Comment on Scrapping the first Shelby Mustang? by admin

admin — Mon, 14 Sep 2009 02:38:57 +0000

This Shelby is definitely a fine piece of American history. The owner takes great pride in the car and is meticulous about restoring it to its original street model condition. He brought it to the Ford dealer as a joke, which made for a great laugh. He would never turn this car in for $4,500, as the Mustang’s current value far surpasses that.

Comment on Scrapping the first Shelby Mustang? by Vicky

Vicky — Sun, 13 Sep 2009 01:44:44 +0000

wow! i can’t believe somebody would give away a shelby just cause its not as “green” as other cars! i would buy that car in a heartbeat! who cares about your “carbon footprint” when you have a beautiful piece of american history in your garage?! it just amazes me! i treat my mustang (a slightly modded 2001 v6) as if it was a million dollar car, which in my eyes she is and anyone lucky enough to own a shelby should treat it with the respect it deserves…..

Comment on Hi Po 289 K Code 9″ Rear End Bracket by admin

admin — Wed, 27 May 2009 15:52:40 +0000

Hi Scott. Thanks for your input. None of the front fender aprons have been changed. They are all stamped “C” code, as is the title. I found another Ford stamping between the two left hand fender apron stamps that is “A” code, like the door tag. All consecutive unit numbers on all of the stamps match. The strange thing was that this car was not modified. Upon further checking, a large percentage of A code and GT cars had the same snubber bracket. I checked my dad’s 1965 factory GT Coupe and it also has the same bracket. I have also heard that early 1965 GT’s (April – early May) did not have a hole drilled in the dash for the fog light switch. The factory used the existing hole on the bottom of the dash. My dad’s car is May 20th and the switch is in the proper location. My car is May 3rd and the fog light switch hole was not drilled at all. Another thing about my car is that it has a GT (or 1965 Pony Interior) gauge opening in the dash. Strange….

Comment on Hi Po 289 K Code 9″ Rear End Bracket by scott

scott — Wed, 27 May 2009 07:15:10 +0000

I have a San jose 64.5 k code with a standard plate I found out that my rear clip had been replaced cut the value in half. Your car may be put together from two salvage cars like mine was. not much you can do about it. check the date codes on the rear sheet metal. they can cut a car in half and add new floor panels after welding the rockers together. Are the front fenders off the car check all 3 vins. you may have a mis-stamp K code on your hands.

Comment on Body Panel Patch Welding Tip by Mig Welding Techniques « FastbackStack, LLC’s Classic Mustang Blog

Mig Welding Techniques « FastbackStack, LLC’s Classic Mustang Blog — Sat, 25 Apr 2009 00:56:53 +0000

[...] more tips on wire feed welding, see our Body Panel Patch Welding Tip [...]